구글 아트 앤 컬처(Google Arts & Culture)의 ‘비영리’ 전략에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 뮤지엄의 공공성을 전용하는 디지털 플랫폼 기업의 비즈니스 모델 -

Translated title of the contribution: A Critical Study on Google Arts & Culture’s “Non-Profit” Strategy and its Appropriation of Publicness of Museums

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

I intended to discuss the new phase of the publicness of museums in a digital environment with the Goole Arts & Culture Project. To this end, I critically examined the instrumental approaches and technological optimism in the application of digital technology to museums, and scrutinized the recent museological issues, particularly the revision or curtailment of the museum’s publicness amid the spread of neoliberal policy, which have been omitted within those technological approaches. This is because the meaning of Google Art & Culture can be considered more effectively through an extended theoretical reconstruction. Based on these theoretical discussions, I critically reviewed how the "non-profit," an important concept that defines the publicness of museums, was adopted and utilized as an business strategy by Google.
As a result, I wanted to reveal that the neoliberalization of museums, the failure of the government’s public function, the crisis of museum’s publicness, and Google’s "non-profit" strategy have been closely related. Armed with advanced digital technology, the GAC project appropriated the publicness of museums as a useful profit-making model. As such, now the concept of publicness of museums is at a point of more controversial and radical transformation than ever before.
Translated title of the contributionA Critical Study on Google Arts & Culture’s “Non-Profit” Strategy and its Appropriation of Publicness of Museums
Original languageKorean
Pages (from-to)33-72
Number of pages40
Journal예술경영연구
Issue number59
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Critical Study on Google Arts & Culture’s “Non-Profit” Strategy and its Appropriation of Publicness of Museums'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this