다중이용시설의 환경부 실내공기 우수시설 인증 사례분석 및 제도 개선 제언

Translated title of the contribution: A Case Study of National Indoor Air Certification for Multi-purpose Facility, and Suggestions for Improvement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: National Indoor Air Certification was introduced to structure an IAQ (Indoor Air Quality) management system for multi-purpose facility that experiences a difficulty in managing IAQ due to floating population. Although its demo projects ended in a seize in 2018, it is expected to restart in the near future. From previous demo projects, many existing facilities that are aged and lack of required records and document were not successful to achieve the certification, even if their IAQ were under decent management. This study aims to present some suggestions of improvement over the existing certification system. Method: Firstly, organization and procedure of the certification were investigated based on author"s experience who is involved in demo project operations. Then, cases of the 2018 demo project were thoroughly analyzed per each primary step. The analysis focuses on identifying practical limits in application and meeting the requirements, irrationales in gaining extra points from field evaluation, misalignment between field evaluation criteria and measured IAQ, and others. Result: This study concludes with suggesting six primary improvements for procedure and criteria of the certification, including providing a separate set of certification criteria for existing facilities and facilities smaller than the legal minimum of certification.
Translated title of the contributionA Case Study of National Indoor Air Certification for Multi-purpose Facility, and Suggestions for Improvement
Original languageKorean
Pages (from-to)63-68
Number of pages6
JournalKIEAE Journal
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Case Study of National Indoor Air Certification for Multi-purpose Facility, and Suggestions for Improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this