「문화기본법」의 선진화 방안

Translated title of the contribution: Strategies for Advancement of the "Framework Act on Culture"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This work aims to whether the (Korean) "Framework Act on Culture" that is enacted on December 30. 2013, and proclaimed from March 31. 2014 is constitutional with the principal of cultural state and its contents have power of rule for globalization.
Through analysis to "Framework Act on Culture", the author finds that the (Korean) "Framework Act on Culture" has following normative problems. First, it is opened for cultural interventions by administrative power. Second, it has a limit as the 'Framework Act' on Culture on the side of structure, scope and clarity etc. Third, the (Korean) "Framework Act on Culture" understands not cultural functions by regions. Forth, it has no Idea about cultural welfare. Fifth, it enacts not provisions who and how supports cultural creations financially. Finally it has no power of rule to regulate several cultural areas.
For overcoming these limits author suggests that the (Korean) "Framework Act on Culture" should secure normative power through settlement of application scope, the subject of authority and responsibility for cultural administrative activities. And above all who takes responsibility for cultural welfare care financially should be enacted in the (Korean) "Framework Act on Culture" in future.

Translated title of the contributionStrategies for Advancement of the "Framework Act on Culture"
Original languageKorean
Pages (from-to)43-60
Number of pages18
Journal법학연구
Volume24
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies for Advancement of the "Framework Act on Culture"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this