Abstract
This study examines which factors have been regarded as important in the preliminary feasibility studies that have been conducted since 1999, when they were started. The analysis reveals that the factors affecting the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) rating were the benefit/cost ratio, economic analysis weight, regional balanced development weight, negative special evaluation items, change of business plan, and tendency of the ruling party.
In addition, the appropriateness of the use of AHP was also found to have room for re-examination in the analysis process and this is suggested. This study has significance in that it provides an opportunity to verify whether the preliminary feasibility study encompasses a suitablevariety of items, and it presents implications about the appropriateness of the AHP methodology designed for comprehensive judgment of a preliminary feasibility study.
In addition, the appropriateness of the use of AHP was also found to have room for re-examination in the analysis process and this is suggested. This study has significance in that it provides an opportunity to verify whether the preliminary feasibility study encompasses a suitablevariety of items, and it presents implications about the appropriateness of the AHP methodology designed for comprehensive judgment of a preliminary feasibility study.
| Translated title of the contribution | Factors influencing preliminary feasibility study |
|---|---|
| Original language | Korean |
| Pages (from-to) | 353-385 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | 한국행정학보 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 2017 |