Abstract
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) has been provided not only manual of managing infectious patient but also functional requirement of space in emergency department(ED) by distributing "Guideline for infection control in emergency department(GICED)" in 2009. To understand how much the guideline enforces its functional requirement on ED planning practice, it is compared to Emergency Medical Service Act(EMSA) a basic standard for ED planning. As a result, it is clear that those have different focal point in functional program and don't share infection control issue. By reviewing target hospitals' EDs opened around 2009, all ED have satisfied with the EMSA requirement but guideline. Those are selectively adapted infection control related spaces CDC guideline suggested regardless of open year so that target EDs are not to be influenced by the guideline. This research can support as a reference research when the EMSA are going to be reinforced by infection contol issue.
| Translated title of the contribution | A Study on an acceptance of CDC guideline on practical emergency department planning -Focusing on comparison CDC guideline to Emergency Medical Service Act- |
|---|---|
| Original language | Korean |
| Pages (from-to) | 7237-7243 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | 한국산학기술학회논문지 |
| Volume | 제16권 |
| Issue number | 제11호 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2015 |