한국안광학회지 게재 논문의 주제어와 MeSH 용어의 비교·분석

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison and Analysis of Keywords in the Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society Articles to MeSH Terms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze keywords of articles in the Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society to MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms. The study hopes to enhance the understanding and usage of MeSH and give fundamental information to the Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society in advance. Methods: A total of 1952 keywords from 409 informative articles published from 2004, Vol 9(1) to 2016, Vol 21(1) were compared with MeSH terms according to the criteria of complete coincidence, incomplete coincidence and complete incoincidence. Results: 439 keywords (22.4%) were completely coincident with MeSH terms, 815 keywords (41.8%) were incompletely coincident with MeSH terms and 693 keywords (35.5%) were completely incoincident with MeSH terms. The most used keyword in MeSH terms is in the order of Myopia, Astigmatism and visual acuity. For the incompletely coincident keywords Refractive error, Soft contact lens, and Phoria were used the most. Finally, the most used keywords in the category of completely incoincident were Accommodative lag and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusions: It is highly recommended that MeSH terms are selected as controlled keywords to increase usage of searced Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society articles in MEDLINE.
Translated title of the contributionComparison and Analysis of Keywords in the Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society Articles to MeSH Terms
Original languageKorean
Pages (from-to)83-90
Number of pages8
Journal한국안광학회지
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison and Analysis of Keywords in the Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society Articles to MeSH Terms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this