TY - JOUR
T1 - A Study of Meaning-focused and Form-focused Tasks on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition of Low and Intermediate Levels
AU - Kang, Dongho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 KASELL All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - While the literature extensively discusses the benefits of form-focused instructions for grammatical aspects, there has been limited research exploring the impact of form-focused tasks on second language vocabulary acquisition. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of meaning-focused and form-focused (both non-contrastive and contrastive) tasks on the vocabulary learning of low and intermediate-level students in Korean college settings. The results revealed that the meaning-focused group demonstrated vocabulary learning gains only in the posttest, whereas both form-focused tasks resulted in significant improvement in both the posttest and delayed test. This suggests that students derived greater benefits from the form-focused tasks compared to the meaning-focused task in terms of L2 vocabulary learning. Additionally, the low proficiency group benefitted more from the non-contrastive form-focused task, while the intermediate group benefitted more from the contrastive form-focused task. The study will delve into the theoretical implications and discuss the pedagogical implications arising from these findings.
AB - While the literature extensively discusses the benefits of form-focused instructions for grammatical aspects, there has been limited research exploring the impact of form-focused tasks on second language vocabulary acquisition. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of meaning-focused and form-focused (both non-contrastive and contrastive) tasks on the vocabulary learning of low and intermediate-level students in Korean college settings. The results revealed that the meaning-focused group demonstrated vocabulary learning gains only in the posttest, whereas both form-focused tasks resulted in significant improvement in both the posttest and delayed test. This suggests that students derived greater benefits from the form-focused tasks compared to the meaning-focused task in terms of L2 vocabulary learning. Additionally, the low proficiency group benefitted more from the non-contrastive form-focused task, while the intermediate group benefitted more from the contrastive form-focused task. The study will delve into the theoretical implications and discuss the pedagogical implications arising from these findings.
KW - contrastive FFI
KW - EFL college contexts
KW - form-focused instruction (FFI)
KW - L1 glosses
KW - L2 glosses
KW - L2 vocabulary
KW - meaning-focused
KW - non-contrastive FFI
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85172783214
U2 - 10.15738/kjell.23..202309.682
DO - 10.15738/kjell.23..202309.682
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85172783214
SN - 1598-1398
VL - 23
SP - 682
EP - 695
JO - Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
JF - Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
ER -