Abstract
The study studied the effects of task types and gloss languages (L1 vs. L2) on academic vocabulary acquisition of the two proficiency groups (English-major vs. Life-long Education) at both short-and long-term periods. Thirty-eight college students in Korea were randomly assigned to one of the four tasks: A reading task with L2 glosses (Involvement Index 1), a reading task with L2 glosses (Index 1), a gap-filling task with L2 glosses (Index 2), and a gap-filling task with L1 glosses (Index 2). The findings showed that there were non-significant learning gains after treatment except the English-major advanced group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences among the four experimental tasks in both groups. The theoretical and pedagogical discussions were made at the conclusion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1300-1312 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics |
| Volume | 22 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- academic vocabulary
- EFL college contexts
- L1 glosses
- L2 glosses
- Lvocabulary
- task-induced involvement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An Exploratory Study of Tasks & Glosses on L2 Academic Vocabulary Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver