TY - JOUR
T1 - An investigation of output flow control, bottleneck flow control and dynamic flow control mechanisms in various simple lines scenarios
AU - Kim, Seonmin
AU - Roscoe Davis, K.
AU - Cox, James F.
PY - 2003/1
Y1 - 2003/1
N2 - Flow control mechanisms have been a topic of academic research for several years. With the growth of business-wide information systems such as enterprise resource planning and supply chain, better planning, scheduling and control of the business transformation process is required in order to achieve increased throughput, reduced inventories, shorter lead times and reduced tardiness. This research compares two new approaches to flow control, output flow control and bottleneck flow control to a real-time flow control system, dynamic flow control. Both output and bottleneck flow control mechanisms are much simpler to implement and manage than dynamic flow control in that they do not require continual feedback and rescheduling. Line characteristics, such as location of breakdowns with respect to the bottleneck, the location of the bottleneck when breakdowns occur, and the impact of variability of processing times on the performance measures (output, WIP level, lateness, and number of tardy jobs) for these three flow control mechanisms are compared. Both output and bottleneck flow control mechanisms perform favourably (particularly bottleneck) under different scenarios and warrant further study across a wider range of scenarios (mixed models, job shops, etc.).
AB - Flow control mechanisms have been a topic of academic research for several years. With the growth of business-wide information systems such as enterprise resource planning and supply chain, better planning, scheduling and control of the business transformation process is required in order to achieve increased throughput, reduced inventories, shorter lead times and reduced tardiness. This research compares two new approaches to flow control, output flow control and bottleneck flow control to a real-time flow control system, dynamic flow control. Both output and bottleneck flow control mechanisms are much simpler to implement and manage than dynamic flow control in that they do not require continual feedback and rescheduling. Line characteristics, such as location of breakdowns with respect to the bottleneck, the location of the bottleneck when breakdowns occur, and the impact of variability of processing times on the performance measures (output, WIP level, lateness, and number of tardy jobs) for these three flow control mechanisms are compared. Both output and bottleneck flow control mechanisms perform favourably (particularly bottleneck) under different scenarios and warrant further study across a wider range of scenarios (mixed models, job shops, etc.).
KW - Bottleneck flow control
KW - CONWIP
KW - Drum buffer rope
KW - Dynamic flow control
KW - Output flow control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142258726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0953728021000039416
DO - 10.1080/0953728021000039416
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0142258726
SN - 0953-7287
VL - 14
SP - 15
EP - 32
JO - Production Planning and Control
JF - Production Planning and Control
IS - 1
ER -