TY - JOUR
T1 - Aqueous redox flow battery using iron 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2′-nitrilotriethanol complex and ferrocyanide as newly developed redox couple
AU - Shin, Mingyu
AU - Oh, Seunghye
AU - Jeong, Hayoung
AU - Noh, Chanho
AU - Chung, Yongjin
AU - Han, Jeong Woo
AU - Kwon, Yongchai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - An all-iron aqueous redox flow battery using iron (Fe) 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2′-nitrilotriethanol (BIS-TRIS) complex (Fe(BIS-TRIS)) and Ferrocyanide (Fe[CN]6) as redox couple is newly suggested. The redox potential of Fe(BIS-TRIS) is −1.11 V (vs Ag/AgCl) and this makes Fe(BIS-TRIS) appropriate as active material for anolyte, while Fe(CN)6 is proper for catholyte due to its excellent redox reactivity, redox potential, and cheap cost. According to quantitative evaluations, Fe(BIS-TRIS) does not produce any side reactions and is more stable than Fe triethanolamine (TEA) (Fe(TEA)) complex that is conventionally considered for the purpose. This fact is confirmed by computational analysis using density functional theory. In the calculation, energy barrier of Fe(BIS-TRIS) suppressing the occurrence of undesirable side reactions is higher than that of other Fe-ligand complexes, indicating that desirable redox reaction of Fe(BIS-TRIS) occurs more stably. In redox flow battery (RFB) tests, RFBs using Fe(BIS-TRIS) do not show any side reactions even after 250 cycles with excellent performances, such as capacity of 11.7 Ah L−1 and coulombic efficiency and capacity retention rate of 99.8 and 99.9%, respectively. This corroborates that RFBs using Fe(BIS-TRIS) have excellency in both performance and stability, while the cheap cost of BIS-TRIS and Fe(CN)6 enhances the economic benefit of RFBs.
AB - An all-iron aqueous redox flow battery using iron (Fe) 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2′-nitrilotriethanol (BIS-TRIS) complex (Fe(BIS-TRIS)) and Ferrocyanide (Fe[CN]6) as redox couple is newly suggested. The redox potential of Fe(BIS-TRIS) is −1.11 V (vs Ag/AgCl) and this makes Fe(BIS-TRIS) appropriate as active material for anolyte, while Fe(CN)6 is proper for catholyte due to its excellent redox reactivity, redox potential, and cheap cost. According to quantitative evaluations, Fe(BIS-TRIS) does not produce any side reactions and is more stable than Fe triethanolamine (TEA) (Fe(TEA)) complex that is conventionally considered for the purpose. This fact is confirmed by computational analysis using density functional theory. In the calculation, energy barrier of Fe(BIS-TRIS) suppressing the occurrence of undesirable side reactions is higher than that of other Fe-ligand complexes, indicating that desirable redox reaction of Fe(BIS-TRIS) occurs more stably. In redox flow battery (RFB) tests, RFBs using Fe(BIS-TRIS) do not show any side reactions even after 250 cycles with excellent performances, such as capacity of 11.7 Ah L−1 and coulombic efficiency and capacity retention rate of 99.8 and 99.9%, respectively. This corroborates that RFBs using Fe(BIS-TRIS) have excellency in both performance and stability, while the cheap cost of BIS-TRIS and Fe(CN)6 enhances the economic benefit of RFBs.
KW - 2,2-bis (hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2′-nitrilotriethanol
KW - all-iron redox flow battery
KW - energy barrier
KW - ferrocyanide
KW - organometallic materials
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123960740
U2 - 10.1002/er.7718
DO - 10.1002/er.7718
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123960740
SN - 0363-907X
VL - 46
SP - 8175
EP - 8185
JO - International Journal of Energy Research
JF - International Journal of Energy Research
IS - 6
ER -