Comparative Study on Active Suspension Controllers with Parameter Adaptive and Static Output Feedback Control

This paper presents a comparative study on active suspension controllers for ride comfort. Two types of active suspension controllers are designed and compared in terms of ride comfort: static output feedback (SOF) and parameter adaptive ones, which have identical controller structure. A quarter-car model is selected as a vehicle model. To date, LQR has been used as an active suspension controller. LQR is hard to implement in real vehicles due to the full-state measurement requirement. To avoid the full-state measurement of LQR, SOF control is selected as a controller structure in this paper. Suspension stroke and its rate are selected as sensor outputs for SOF and parameter active controllers. Two types of SOF controllers are designed. The first is the LQ SOF controller, designed with the state-space model and LQ cost function. The second is SOF controllers, designed by simulation-based optimization (SBOM) for the quarter-car model with nonlinear spring and damper. A parameter adaptive controller is designed with the recursive lease square (RLS) algorithm and its equivalent extended Kalman filter (EKF). For comparison, LQR is designed and used as a baseline. From simulation results, it is shown that the static output feedback and parameter adaptive controllers are equivalent to each other in terms of controller structure and ride comfort and which conditions are needed for better control performance on those controllers.