Comparison and distribution of copper oxide nanoparticles and copper ions in activated sludge reactors

Dongqing Zhang, Antoine P. Trzcinski, Hyun Suk Oh, Evelyn Chew, Soon Keat Tan, Wun Jern Ng, Yu Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) are being increasingly applied in the industry which results inevitably in the release of these materials into the hydrosphere. In this study, simulated waste-activated sludge experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of Copper Oxide NPs at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and 50 mg/L and to compare it with its ionic counterpart (CuSO4). It was found that 0.1 mg/L of CuO NPs had negligible effects on Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and ammonia removal. However, the presence of 1, 10 and 50 mg/L of CuO NPs decreased COD removal from 78.7% to 77%, 52.1% and 39.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). The corresponding effluent ammonium (NH4-N) concentration increased from 14.9 mg/L to 18, 25.1 and 30.8 mg/L, respectively. Under equal Cu concentration, copper ions were more toxic towards microorganisms compared to CuO NPs. CuO NPs were removed effectively (72–93.2%) from wastewater due to a greater biosorption capacity of CuO NPs onto activated sludge, compared to the copper ions (55.1–83.4%). The SEM images clearly showed the accumulation and adsorption of CuO NPs onto activated sludge. The decrease in Live/dead ratio after 5 h of exposure of CuO NPs and Cu2+ indicated the loss of cell viability in sludge flocs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-514
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 May 2017

Keywords

  • biosorption
  • copper ions
  • CuO nanoparticles
  • waste-activated sludge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison and distribution of copper oxide nanoparticles and copper ions in activated sludge reactors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this