Comparison of a least-square weighted residual method and the Taylor-Galerkin method based on level set formulation for interface capturing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this study, a least-square weighted residual method and the Taylor-Galerkin method have been adopted for the discretisation of the two hyperbolic-type equations of level set method: advection and reinitialisation equations. The accuracy and efficiency of the two methods were compared by solving a time-reversed vortex flow and a three-dimensional broken dam flows. A four-step splitting P1P1 finite element method was used for the solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. These numerical experiments showed that both the least-square weighted residual method and the Taylor-Galerkin method were first-order accurate in space and that the least-square method was more accurate and conservative than Taylor-Galerkin method in terms of mass error.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-174
Number of pages6
JournalProgress in Computational Fluid Dynamics
Volume11
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Keywords

  • Advection
  • Least-square weighted residual method
  • Level set method
  • Reinitialisation
  • Taylor-Galerkin method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of a least-square weighted residual method and the Taylor-Galerkin method based on level set formulation for interface capturing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this