Abstract
Thus far, the removal efficiency of non-pointpollution source removal facilities has been evaluated for individual rainfall events. However, as the removal efficiency for part of a single rainfall event has not been evaluated, adapting the removal facilities for these concentrations is imprecise. Of 18 rainfall events, the removal efficiency of a vortex-type facility as a BMP (Best Management Practice), a non-point-pollution source removal method, was assessed in this study in four assessment techniques and analyzed. In addition, the efficiency was assessed for the concentration using dynamic EMC (Event Mean Concentration). At a higher concentration, the efficiency becomes higher in terms of the TSS, COD, and TP results. In the case of TP, the concentration range of 0~2 mg/L showed the highest efficiency. In the case of Zn, low efficiency was shown in a concentration range of 0.2~0.6 mg/L.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 937-944 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Environmental Earth Sciences |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Dynamic EMC
- Non-point sources
- Removal efficiency
- Vortex-type facility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Determination of the removal efficiency of a vortex-type facility as a best management practice using the dynamic event mean concentration: A case study of a bridge in Yong-In city in Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver