Does whistleblowing always compromise bureaucratic reputation? Exploring the role of accountability institutions through bureaucratic reputation theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Organizational reputation is subject to losses when whistleblowing occurs. Based on ethics management and bureaucratic reputation theories, we examined whether the loss could vary depending on whistleblowing channels, such as official channels of accountability institutions (U.S. Office of Special Counsel and Office of Inspector General), and unofficial channels (media) and the existence of whistleblowing management from official channels. From survey experiments with U.S. citizens, we found reputational loss may occur after whistleblowing, but it could be mitigated when managed properly through accountability institutions. Our findings suggest the importance of governments showing efforts to resolve moral issues from citizens’ views.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2241-2267
Number of pages27
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume27
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Bureaucratic reputation
  • U.S. federal government
  • ethics management
  • survey experiment
  • whistleblowing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does whistleblowing always compromise bureaucratic reputation? Exploring the role of accountability institutions through bureaucratic reputation theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this