Economic benefits of preventing bird collisions in South Korea: findings from a choice experiment survey

Chang Min Kim, Ju Hee Kim, Seung Hoon Yoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bird deaths due to collisions with artificial structures, such as glass windows of buildings and transparent noise barriers, are continuing to occur in South Korea. The government is trying to prevent bird collisions by increasing the attachment of specially designed tapes to help birds avoid windows. This article estimates the economic benefits arising from the prevention of collisions by applying a choice experiment (CE). For this purpose, a CE survey of 1000 South Korean interviewees was conducted. The four attributes to be attached with the tapes for the CE application were a transparent soundproof wall window on an expressway, a transparent soundproof wall window on a general road, a glass window in a public building, and a glass window in a private building. The unit was the percentage of each structure with the tapes attached to the window. The marginal values of a one-unit (1%p) increase in each attribute were computed to be KRW 534 (USD 0.46), KRW 233 (USD 0.20), KRW 1,318 (USD 1.13), and KRW 12,930 (USD 11.05), respectively. This quantitative information will be an important reference for implementing the prevention policy. For example, based on the collision prevention of 1000 birds per structure, the priority for attaching tapes can be placed in the order of expressways, public buildings, private buildings, and general roads.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2945-2957
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023

Keywords

  • Bird collision
  • Choice experiment
  • Economic benefit
  • Transparent window

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic benefits of preventing bird collisions in South Korea: findings from a choice experiment survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this