TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of nafion membrane thickness on performance of vanadium redox flow battery
AU - Jeong, Sanghyun
AU - Kim, Lae Hyun
AU - Kwon, Yongchai
AU - Kim, Sunhoe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers, Seoul, Korea.
PY - 2014/11
Y1 - 2014/11
N2 - The performance of vanadium redox ow batteries (VRFBs) using different membrane thicknesses was evaluated and compared. The associated experiments were conducted with Nafion® 117 and 212 membranes that have 175 and 50 μm of thickness, respectively. The charge efficiency (CE) and energy efficiency (EE) of VRFB using Nafion® 117 were higher than those of VRFB using Nafion® 212, while power efficiency was vice versa. In terms of amounts of charge and discharge that are measured in different charging current densities, the amounts in VRFB using Nafion® 212 are more than that in VRFB using Nafion® 117. To further characterize the effect of membrane thickness on VRFB performance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and UV-vis. spectrophotometer (UV-vis) were used. In EIS measurements, VRFB using Nafion® 117 was more stable than that using Nafion® 212, while in UV-vis measurements, vanadium crossover rate of VRFB usingNafion® 212 (0.0125M/hr) was higher than that of VRFB using Nafion® 117 (0.0054 M/hr). These results are attributed to high crossover rate of vanadium ion in VRFB using Nafion® 212. With these results, vanadium crossover plays more dominant role than electrochemical reaction resistance in deciding performance of VRFB in condition of different membranes.
AB - The performance of vanadium redox ow batteries (VRFBs) using different membrane thicknesses was evaluated and compared. The associated experiments were conducted with Nafion® 117 and 212 membranes that have 175 and 50 μm of thickness, respectively. The charge efficiency (CE) and energy efficiency (EE) of VRFB using Nafion® 117 were higher than those of VRFB using Nafion® 212, while power efficiency was vice versa. In terms of amounts of charge and discharge that are measured in different charging current densities, the amounts in VRFB using Nafion® 212 are more than that in VRFB using Nafion® 117. To further characterize the effect of membrane thickness on VRFB performance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and UV-vis. spectrophotometer (UV-vis) were used. In EIS measurements, VRFB using Nafion® 117 was more stable than that using Nafion® 212, while in UV-vis measurements, vanadium crossover rate of VRFB usingNafion® 212 (0.0125M/hr) was higher than that of VRFB using Nafion® 117 (0.0054 M/hr). These results are attributed to high crossover rate of vanadium ion in VRFB using Nafion® 212. With these results, vanadium crossover plays more dominant role than electrochemical reaction resistance in deciding performance of VRFB in condition of different membranes.
KW - Electrical Conductivity
KW - Electrochemical Impedance
KW - Energy Storage System
KW - Membrane Thickness
KW - Proton Exchange Membrane
KW - Vanadium Redox Flow Battery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919628109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11814-014-0157-5
DO - 10.1007/s11814-014-0157-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84919628109
SN - 0256-1115
VL - 31
SP - 2081
EP - 2087
JO - Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
JF - Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
IS - 11
ER -