TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing Readability in Construction Safety Reports Using a Two-Step Quantitative Analysis Approach
AU - Oh, Jihyun
AU - Jeong, Jaewook
AU - Jeong, Jaemin
AU - Kumi, Louis
AU - Mun, Hyeongjun
AU - Kwon, Hyugsoo
AU - Kim, Hoyoung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - This study addresses the limitations of South Korea’s Design for Safety (DfS) reports, which are a critical component of construction safety reports (CSRs) but rely heavily on text, limiting readability and visual comprehension. While previous studies have highlighted the readability challenges in construction safety documents, few have quantitatively combined layout and readability assessments using objective metrics. To enhance information delivery, this research proposes an improved CSR format and quantitatively evaluates its effectiveness compared to the conventional format. A two-step analysis was conducted using document layout analysis, pixel-based methods, and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) to assess layout and readability. The results showed that conventional CSRs consist of nearly 100% text, while the improved format integrates approximately 70% images and 30% text, enhancing visual clarity without altering content. The improved format achieved a higher average FRES score of 50.24 compared to 44.52 for the conventional format, indicating a 1.12-fold increase in readability. These findings suggest that the improved CSR format significantly enhances comprehension and information delivery. The proposed quantitative analysis method offers a practical approach for evaluating and improving document design in construction safety, and it can be applied to other fields to improve the effectiveness of written communication.
AB - This study addresses the limitations of South Korea’s Design for Safety (DfS) reports, which are a critical component of construction safety reports (CSRs) but rely heavily on text, limiting readability and visual comprehension. While previous studies have highlighted the readability challenges in construction safety documents, few have quantitatively combined layout and readability assessments using objective metrics. To enhance information delivery, this research proposes an improved CSR format and quantitatively evaluates its effectiveness compared to the conventional format. A two-step analysis was conducted using document layout analysis, pixel-based methods, and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) to assess layout and readability. The results showed that conventional CSRs consist of nearly 100% text, while the improved format integrates approximately 70% images and 30% text, enhancing visual clarity without altering content. The improved format achieved a higher average FRES score of 50.24 compared to 44.52 for the conventional format, indicating a 1.12-fold increase in readability. These findings suggest that the improved CSR format significantly enhances comprehension and information delivery. The proposed quantitative analysis method offers a practical approach for evaluating and improving document design in construction safety, and it can be applied to other fields to improve the effectiveness of written communication.
KW - Anderson–Darling goodness-of-fit test
KW - construction safety report
KW - document layout analysis
KW - Flesch Reading Ease Score
KW - Monte Carlo simulation
KW - readability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008962844
U2 - 10.3390/buildings15121994
DO - 10.3390/buildings15121994
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008962844
SN - 2075-5309
VL - 15
JO - Buildings
JF - Buildings
IS - 12
M1 - 1994
ER -