Evaluating performance degradation due to block size increase in 3D NAND-based SSDs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recently, 3D NAND has been proposed that dramatically improves the integration density of NAND flash memory. 3D NAND has advantages over conventional 2D NAND in that it reliably stores data, improves the integration density, and speeds up data writing, but there is a potential risk that the NAND block size increases significantly. When the block size increases, the number of valid pages of the victim block increases during garbage collection, which increases the latency of the garbage collection. As a result, the SSD performance may deteriorate. Therefore, in this study, the performance degradation due to the increase of the block size in the 3D NAND-based SSD is analysed and the following conclusions are drawn. First, the average performance is not degraded much. The average response time is maximally increased up to 7.1% in fin1 trace. This is because the latency of individual garbage collection is longer, but the total number of garbage collections is reduced. Second, the decrease in the tail performance is relatively large. fin1 trace have an increase of about 4.8x tail latency, and other traces have a longer latency of 5.6%-20.2%. Therefore, when using 3D NAND, we should focus on improving the tail performance rather than the average performance, and it is expected that the performance enhancement through clustering hot data and cold data separately is relatively large in 3D NAND. In other words, the block size increase of 3D NAND can be an opportunity for improving SSD performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-123
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Engineering Research and Technology
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • 3D NAND
  • Block size
  • Garbage collection
  • SSD

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating performance degradation due to block size increase in 3D NAND-based SSDs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this