TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of sheet-coated composite waterproofing joint types by analysis of tensile strength change and concrete displacement resistance testing under environmental degradation
AU - Chung, Chang Pyo
AU - Choi, Su Young
AU - Kim, Dong Bum
AU - Park, Wan Goo
AU - Kim, Byoung Il
AU - Oh, Sang Keun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Sheet-coated composite waterproofing (SCCW) have been developed to overcome the natural weakness of singly-ply coating or sheet waterproofing systems for roofing, but there are currently multiple types of SCCW joints. Conventional standard tensile strength testing results show that all SCCW joint types seem to pass the minimum requirement and current selection of SCCW type is dictated on the principle of 'higher tensile strength is better', but it has not been experimentally studied as to which type is the optimal to respond to environmental degradation while under the effect of zero-span tensile stress occurring during concrete joint displacement. In this study, five types of SCCW joints were tested: Overlap Bond (OB) type, Overlap Heated-AirWelding (OH) type, Butt Joint I Type (BI), Butt Joint T Type (BT), and Butt Joint Separation Movement Type (BS). These types of joint designs were subjected to Alkali, NaCl, and H2SO4 exposure, and temperature change (60°C and -20°C) for determining changes to tensile strength in the joint section. Tensile strength change results are compared to joint displacement resistance test results of specimens that were treated with chemical and temperature degradation. With the exception of chemical exposure conditioning, the Overlap type joints generally had higher tensile strength compared to the butt joint types, but joint displacement test results showed the opposite results, suggesting that complex joints found in SCCW require new evaluation method for quality assessment.
AB - Sheet-coated composite waterproofing (SCCW) have been developed to overcome the natural weakness of singly-ply coating or sheet waterproofing systems for roofing, but there are currently multiple types of SCCW joints. Conventional standard tensile strength testing results show that all SCCW joint types seem to pass the minimum requirement and current selection of SCCW type is dictated on the principle of 'higher tensile strength is better', but it has not been experimentally studied as to which type is the optimal to respond to environmental degradation while under the effect of zero-span tensile stress occurring during concrete joint displacement. In this study, five types of SCCW joints were tested: Overlap Bond (OB) type, Overlap Heated-AirWelding (OH) type, Butt Joint I Type (BI), Butt Joint T Type (BT), and Butt Joint Separation Movement Type (BS). These types of joint designs were subjected to Alkali, NaCl, and H2SO4 exposure, and temperature change (60°C and -20°C) for determining changes to tensile strength in the joint section. Tensile strength change results are compared to joint displacement resistance test results of specimens that were treated with chemical and temperature degradation. With the exception of chemical exposure conditioning, the Overlap type joints generally had higher tensile strength compared to the butt joint types, but joint displacement test results showed the opposite results, suggesting that complex joints found in SCCW require new evaluation method for quality assessment.
KW - Environmental degradation
KW - Overlap joint
KW - Sheet-coated composite waterproofing
KW - Tensile strength
KW - Waterproofing joints
KW - Zero-span tensile stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085552852&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ma13092120
DO - 10.3390/ma13092120
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085552852
SN - 1996-1944
VL - 13
JO - Materials
JF - Materials
IS - 9
M1 - 2120
ER -