Abstract
The administration of naked DNA into animals is increasing as a research tool to develop DNA vaccine. To monitor the distribution and duration of gene expression of a DNA vaccine in living organisms, we used the naked DNA encoding firefly luciferase (Fluc) as an imaging reporter gene, and evaluated in vivo bioluminescent images in a murine model. We observed bioluminescence at the injection site and at inguinal lymph node from 10 h to 24 h post-injection when DNA vaccine encoding Fluc (pcDNA3.1-Fluc) was injected into the bilateral posterior flanks in mice. Fluc gene expressions at injection sites and unilateral posterior flank inguinal lymph node were also confirmed by RT-PCR. However, when pcDNA3.1-Fluc was injected into the mid-dorsum bioluminescent signals were observed at the injection site for up to 14 days post-injection, but no bioluminescent signals were detected in inguinal lymph nodes. Concurrent mRNA expressions of Fluc gene at injection sites but not at inguinal lymph nodes were confirmed by RT-PCR. These findings suggest that optical imaging using Fluc could be useful for monitoring the location, intensity and duration of gene expression of naked DNA vaccines in living animals non-invasively and repetitively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3057-3062 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Vaccine |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 16 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 12 Apr 2006 |
Keywords
- DNA vaccine gene expression
- Firefly luciferase
- In vivo visualization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In vivo monitoring of DNA vaccine gene expression using firefly luciferase as a naked DNA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver