TY - JOUR
T1 - Layered composite membranes based on porous PVDF coated with a thin, dense PBI layer for vanadium redox flow batteries
AU - Lee, W.
AU - Jung, Mina
AU - Serhiichuk, Dmytro
AU - Noh, Chanho
AU - Gupta, Gaurav
AU - Harms, Corinna
AU - Kwon, Yongchai
AU - Henkensmeier, Dirk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - A commercial porous polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (pore size 0.65 μm, nominally 125 μm thick) is spray coated with 1.2–4 μm thick layers of polybenzimidazole. The area resistance of the porous support is 36.4 mΩ cm2 in 2 M sulfuric acid, in comparison to 540 mΩ cm2 for a 27 μm thick acid doped polybenzimidazole membrane, and 124 mΩ cm2 for PVDF-P20 (4 μm thick blocking layer). Addition of vanadium ions to the supporting electrolyte increases the resistance, but less than for Nafion. The expected reason is a change in the osmotic pressure when the ionic strength of the electrolyte is increased, reducing the water contents in the membrane. The orientation of the composite membranes has a strong impact. Lower permeability values are found when the blocking layer is oriented towards the vanadium-lean side in ex-situ measurements. Cells with the blocking layer on the positive side have significantly lower capacity fade, also much lower than cells using Nafion 212. The coulombic efficiency of cells with PVDF-PBI membranes (98.4%) is higher than that of cells using Nafion 212 (93.6%), whereas the voltage efficiency is just slightly lower, resulting in energy efficiencies of 85.1 and 83.3%, respectively, at 80 mA/cm2.
AB - A commercial porous polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (pore size 0.65 μm, nominally 125 μm thick) is spray coated with 1.2–4 μm thick layers of polybenzimidazole. The area resistance of the porous support is 36.4 mΩ cm2 in 2 M sulfuric acid, in comparison to 540 mΩ cm2 for a 27 μm thick acid doped polybenzimidazole membrane, and 124 mΩ cm2 for PVDF-P20 (4 μm thick blocking layer). Addition of vanadium ions to the supporting electrolyte increases the resistance, but less than for Nafion. The expected reason is a change in the osmotic pressure when the ionic strength of the electrolyte is increased, reducing the water contents in the membrane. The orientation of the composite membranes has a strong impact. Lower permeability values are found when the blocking layer is oriented towards the vanadium-lean side in ex-situ measurements. Cells with the blocking layer on the positive side have significantly lower capacity fade, also much lower than cells using Nafion 212. The coulombic efficiency of cells with PVDF-PBI membranes (98.4%) is higher than that of cells using Nafion 212 (93.6%), whereas the voltage efficiency is just slightly lower, resulting in energy efficiencies of 85.1 and 83.3%, respectively, at 80 mA/cm2.
KW - Composite membranes
KW - Polybenzimidazole blocking layer
KW - Porous PVDF
KW - Vanadium redox flow batteries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073254817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117333
DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117333
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073254817
SN - 0376-7388
VL - 591
JO - Journal of Membrane Science
JF - Journal of Membrane Science
M1 - 117333
ER -