Managing for results differently: Examining managers’ purposeful performance information use in public, nonprofit, and private organizations

Morgen Johansen, Taehee Kim, Ling Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Performance information (PI) is only valuable when decision makers use it to improve their organization. Despite its importance, evidence on PI use is still limited, particularly about PI use in different contexts and for specific purposes. This article examines managers’ use of PI for specific purposes (purposeful PI [PPI]) and compares cross-sector differences in reported PPI use with a survey of nearly 1,000 top-level hospital managers in public, private, and nonprofit hospitals in the United States, while controlling for task. Findings show significant cross-sector differences in reported PPI use in three decision areas: personnel, day-to-day operations, and service efficiency, and that public managers use PI significantly less than their private and nonprofit counterparts in most decision areas. Results are discussed within the literature on performance management and cross-sector differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-147
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Cross-sector differences
  • Performance management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing for results differently: Examining managers’ purposeful performance information use in public, nonprofit, and private organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this