TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal implementation of lid facilities in the mid-upper youngsan river basin for runoff reduction performance and economic efficiency
AU - Kim, Minjeong
AU - Park, Inhwan
AU - Chae, Seung Taek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Korea Water Resources Association.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - This study aims to determine the optimal Low Impact Development (LID) implementation strategies considering runoff reduction performance and economic efficiency in the mid-upper region of the Youngsan River basin. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was used to simulate rainfall-runoff processes and LID implementation strategies. The study focused on areas with an impervious surface ratio exceeding 50%, comparing the optimal design parameters and runoff reduction performance of Permeable Pavement (PP), Infiltration Trench (IT), Bio-Retention Cell (BRC), and Rain Garden (RG). To optimize the design parameters of these LID facilities two approaches were applied: (Case 1) determining a single design parameter minimizing total runoff across the entire study area and (Case 2) determining individual design parameters that minimize runoff for each sub-watershed. The comparison of runoff reduction performance between the two cases showed that Case 2 showed superior runoff reduction performance compared to Case 1. In Case 1, IT was identified as the optimal facility in all sub-watersheds, whereas Case 2 resulted in different optimal LID facility types depending on the runoff characteristics of each sub-watershed. In Case 2, BRC was determined as the most frequently selected facility. When considering the economic efficiency of construction and maintenance costs, RG demonstrated the highest cost-effectiveness in runoff mitigation for both cases. Consequently, applying the optimal LID facility allocation strategy that accounts for both runoff reduction performance and economic efficiency resulted in a total runoff reduction of 6.36% in Case 1 and 7.16% in Case 2.
AB - This study aims to determine the optimal Low Impact Development (LID) implementation strategies considering runoff reduction performance and economic efficiency in the mid-upper region of the Youngsan River basin. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was used to simulate rainfall-runoff processes and LID implementation strategies. The study focused on areas with an impervious surface ratio exceeding 50%, comparing the optimal design parameters and runoff reduction performance of Permeable Pavement (PP), Infiltration Trench (IT), Bio-Retention Cell (BRC), and Rain Garden (RG). To optimize the design parameters of these LID facilities two approaches were applied: (Case 1) determining a single design parameter minimizing total runoff across the entire study area and (Case 2) determining individual design parameters that minimize runoff for each sub-watershed. The comparison of runoff reduction performance between the two cases showed that Case 2 showed superior runoff reduction performance compared to Case 1. In Case 1, IT was identified as the optimal facility in all sub-watersheds, whereas Case 2 resulted in different optimal LID facility types depending on the runoff characteristics of each sub-watershed. In Case 2, BRC was determined as the most frequently selected facility. When considering the economic efficiency of construction and maintenance costs, RG demonstrated the highest cost-effectiveness in runoff mitigation for both cases. Consequently, applying the optimal LID facility allocation strategy that accounts for both runoff reduction performance and economic efficiency resulted in a total runoff reduction of 6.36% in Case 1 and 7.16% in Case 2.
KW - Construction and maintenance cost
KW - Design parameter optimization
KW - Low Impact Development (LID)
KW - Runoff reduction
KW - SWMM
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012313550
U2 - 10.3741/JKWRA.2025.58.6.483
DO - 10.3741/JKWRA.2025.58.6.483
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012313550
SN - 2799-8746
VL - 58
SP - 483
EP - 495
JO - Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
JF - Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
IS - 6
ER -