Role of interface shape on the laminar flow through an array of superhydrophobic pillars

In this study, measurements of the pressure drop and the velocity vector fields through a regular array of superhydrophobic pillars were systematically taken to investigate the role of air–water interface shape on laminar drag reduction. A polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic channel was created with a regular array of apple-core-shaped and circular pillars bridging across the entire channel. Due to the shape and hydrophobicity of the apple-core-shaped pillars, air was trapped on the side of the pillars after filling the microchannel with water. The measurements were taken at a capillary number of Ca = 6.6 × 10⁻⁵. The shape of the air–water interface trapped within the superhydrophobic apple-core-shaped pillars was systematically modified from concave to convex by changing the static pressure within the microchannel. The pressure drop through the microchannel containing the superhydrophobic apple-core-shaped pillars was found to be sensitive to the shape of the air–water interface. For static pressures which resulted in the apple-core-shaped superhydrophobic pillars having a circular cross section, D/D₀ = 1, a drag reduction of 7% was measured as a result of slip along the air–water interface. At large static pressures, the interface was driven into the apple-core-shaped pillars, resulting in decrease in the effective size of the pillars and an increase in the effective spacing between pillars. When combined with a slip velocity measured to be 10% of the average velocity between the pillars, the result was a pressure drop reduction of 18% compared to the circular pillars at a non-dimensional interface diameter of D/D₀ = 0.8. At low static pressures, the pressure drop increased significantly as the expanded air–water interface constricted flow through the array of pillars even as large interfacial slip velocity was maintained. At D/D₀ = 1.1, for example, the pressure drop increased by 17% compared to the circular pillar. This drag increase was the result of an increased form drag due to a decrease in porosity and permeability of the pillar array and a decrease in the skin friction drag due to the presence of the air–water interface. For D/D₀ = 1.1, the slip velocity was measured to be 45% of the average streamwise velocity between the pillars. When compared to no-slip pillars of similar shape, the drag reduction was found to increase from 6 to 9% with increasing convex curvature of the air–water interface.