TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection framework of representative general circulation models using the selected best bias correction method
AU - Song, Young Hoon
AU - Chung, Eun Sung
AU - Sung, Jang Hyunc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Korea Water Resources Association.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - This study proposes the framework to select the representative general circulation model (GCM) for climate change projection. The grid-based results of GCMs were transformed to all considered meteorological stations using inverse distance weighted (IDW) method and its results were compared to the observed precipitation. Six quantile mapping methods and random forest method were used to correct the bias between GCM’s and the observation data. Thus, the empirical quantile which belongs to non-parameteric transformation method was selected as a best bias correction method by comparing the measures of performance indicators. Then, one of the multi-criteria decision techniques, TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Ideal Solution), was used to find the representative GCM using the performances of four GCMs after the bias correction using empirical quantile method. As a result, GISS-E2-R was the best and followed by MIROC5, CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, and CCSM4. Because these results are limited several GCMs, different results will be expected if more GCM data considered.
AB - This study proposes the framework to select the representative general circulation model (GCM) for climate change projection. The grid-based results of GCMs were transformed to all considered meteorological stations using inverse distance weighted (IDW) method and its results were compared to the observed precipitation. Six quantile mapping methods and random forest method were used to correct the bias between GCM’s and the observation data. Thus, the empirical quantile which belongs to non-parameteric transformation method was selected as a best bias correction method by comparing the measures of performance indicators. Then, one of the multi-criteria decision techniques, TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Ideal Solution), was used to find the representative GCM using the performances of four GCMs after the bias correction using empirical quantile method. As a result, GISS-E2-R was the best and followed by MIROC5, CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, and CCSM4. Because these results are limited several GCMs, different results will be expected if more GCM data considered.
KW - Bias correction
KW - General circulation model (GCM)
KW - Quantile mapping
KW - Random forest
KW - TOPSIS (Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159052343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3741/JKWRA.2019.52.5.337
DO - 10.3741/JKWRA.2019.52.5.337
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159052343
SN - 2799-8746
VL - 52
SP - 337
EP - 347
JO - Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
JF - Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
IS - 5
ER -