Abstract
This study proposes the framework to select the representative general circulation model (GCM) for climate change projection. The grid-based results of GCMs were transformed to all considered meteorological stations using inverse distance weighted (IDW) method and its results were compared to the observed precipitation. Six quantile mapping methods and random forest method were used to correct the bias between GCM’s and the observation data. Thus, the empirical quantile which belongs to non-parameteric transformation method was selected as a best bias correction method by comparing the measures of performance indicators. Then, one of the multi-criteria decision techniques, TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Ideal Solution), was used to find the representative GCM using the performances of four GCMs after the bias correction using empirical quantile method. As a result, GISS-E2-R was the best and followed by MIROC5, CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, and CCSM4. Because these results are limited several GCMs, different results will be expected if more GCM data considered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 337-347 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Korea Water Resources Association |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Bias correction
- General circulation model (GCM)
- Quantile mapping
- Random forest
- TOPSIS (Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Selection framework of representative general circulation models using the selected best bias correction method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver