TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation analysis of macro-packed phase change materials (mppcm) to reduce building energy use
AU - Yeol Yun, Beom
AU - Yang, Sungwoong
AU - Hun Park, Ji
AU - Lee, Jongki
AU - Wi, Seunghwan
AU - Kim, Sumin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2019/10/23
Y1 - 2019/10/23
N2 - This study sets up a zone-construction combination by constructing walls based on the classification of climates classified according to Korea's energy saving design standards and the heat paring rate standard of the wall. There are four climatic divisions, C1, C2, S, and J, and we have used representative climate data for each climate. The target building was a residential apartment, which is the main residential type of large cities in Korea and the world. In the set combination, PCM of TES system is placed indoors, and applied PCM is n-hexadecane, n-heptadecane, n-octadecane with phase change temperature of 20-28 °C corresponding to room temperature standard. Each PCM is set at 0.1% to 0.9% of the area of the building. We used Energy Plus 8.7, a building energy simulation, and analyzed the energy saving and economic efficiency of the building. Saved energy was 2.71% on average and we were able to save up to 4.56%. In addition, we conducted an economic analysis, saving an average of 3.42% and saving up to 7.48%.
AB - This study sets up a zone-construction combination by constructing walls based on the classification of climates classified according to Korea's energy saving design standards and the heat paring rate standard of the wall. There are four climatic divisions, C1, C2, S, and J, and we have used representative climate data for each climate. The target building was a residential apartment, which is the main residential type of large cities in Korea and the world. In the set combination, PCM of TES system is placed indoors, and applied PCM is n-hexadecane, n-heptadecane, n-octadecane with phase change temperature of 20-28 °C corresponding to room temperature standard. Each PCM is set at 0.1% to 0.9% of the area of the building. We used Energy Plus 8.7, a building energy simulation, and analyzed the energy saving and economic efficiency of the building. Saved energy was 2.71% on average and we were able to save up to 4.56%. In addition, we conducted an economic analysis, saving an average of 3.42% and saving up to 7.48%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074418409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1757-899X/609/4/042058
DO - 10.1088/1757-899X/609/4/042058
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85074418409
SN - 1757-8981
VL - 609
JO - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
JF - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
IS - 4
M1 - 042058
T2 - 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation and Energy Conservation in Buildings, IAQVEC 2019
Y2 - 5 September 2019 through 7 September 2019
ER -