TY - JOUR
T1 - Techno-economic assessment of industrial food waste composting facility
T2 - Evaluating bulking agents, processing strategies, and market dynamics
AU - Su, Yuao
AU - Zhou, Shenxian
AU - Tian, Peiyu
AU - Qi, Chuanren
AU - Xu, Zhicheng
AU - Zhang, Yiran
AU - Huh, Sung Yoon
AU - Luo, Wenhai
AU - Li, Guoxue
AU - Li, Yangyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Techno-economic assessment (TEA) of a valorization of bulking agent (BA) ratios on the food waste compost value chain is made to assess economic feasibility. TEA was performed with two plans (Plan A: existing composting facilities; Plan B: new composting facilities) and each plan was under four scenarios. The BA (i.e. corn stalks, garden waste, and watermelon seedlings) ratio of 5 % (S1), 10 % (S2), 20 % (S3), and garden waste with a ratio of 20 % (S4). Results indicate that S2, with a net present value (NPV) of 128.9 million, represents Plan A's most economically viable scenario. Although the total operating costs of S4 were 18.9 %–23.5 % higher, 25.6 %–42.2 % higher total revenue made S4 have an NPV of 92.9 million, making it the most viable scenario in Plan B. All scenarios show positive NPV within a ± 20 % fluctuation range. Organic fertilizer price, government subsidies, and processing capacity were the key factors influencing NPV.
AB - Techno-economic assessment (TEA) of a valorization of bulking agent (BA) ratios on the food waste compost value chain is made to assess economic feasibility. TEA was performed with two plans (Plan A: existing composting facilities; Plan B: new composting facilities) and each plan was under four scenarios. The BA (i.e. corn stalks, garden waste, and watermelon seedlings) ratio of 5 % (S1), 10 % (S2), 20 % (S3), and garden waste with a ratio of 20 % (S4). Results indicate that S2, with a net present value (NPV) of 128.9 million, represents Plan A's most economically viable scenario. Although the total operating costs of S4 were 18.9 %–23.5 % higher, 25.6 %–42.2 % higher total revenue made S4 have an NPV of 92.9 million, making it the most viable scenario in Plan B. All scenarios show positive NPV within a ± 20 % fluctuation range. Organic fertilizer price, government subsidies, and processing capacity were the key factors influencing NPV.
KW - Composting
KW - Food waste
KW - Net present value
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Techno-economic analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200581973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131210
DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131210
M3 - Article
C2 - 39098353
AN - SCOPUS:85200581973
SN - 0960-8524
VL - 408
JO - Bioresource Technology
JF - Bioresource Technology
M1 - 131210
ER -