TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal discretization of viscous stress terms of incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with surface tension effect
AU - Choi, Sanghun
AU - Choi, Hyoung Gwon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - In this study, four temporal discretization methods for viscous stress terms were examined through the finite element method for incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with surface tension effect. The temporal stability and numerical accuracy of the four methods were evaluated in static and rising bubble benchmark problems with severe temporal restrictions caused by viscous stress terms. First, conservative and non-conservative discretization methods were compared in terms of stability and accuracy. The stability and accuracy of the numerical solutions were further investigated through three temporal discretization methods (i.e., fully implicit, semi-implicit, and fully explicit) for viscous stress terms. Nonconservative discretization may yield an incorrect solution although it provides a compact element matrix that reduces CPU time for matrix–vector multiplication. Among the three temporal discretization methods for the conservative treatment of viscous stress terms, the fully implicit method is recommended for cases with strong viscous stress. This method requires an element matrix that is larger than those of the other methods. However, the time-step limit caused by the explicit or semiimplicit treatment of viscous stress terms can be avoided.
AB - In this study, four temporal discretization methods for viscous stress terms were examined through the finite element method for incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with surface tension effect. The temporal stability and numerical accuracy of the four methods were evaluated in static and rising bubble benchmark problems with severe temporal restrictions caused by viscous stress terms. First, conservative and non-conservative discretization methods were compared in terms of stability and accuracy. The stability and accuracy of the numerical solutions were further investigated through three temporal discretization methods (i.e., fully implicit, semi-implicit, and fully explicit) for viscous stress terms. Nonconservative discretization may yield an incorrect solution although it provides a compact element matrix that reduces CPU time for matrix–vector multiplication. Among the three temporal discretization methods for the conservative treatment of viscous stress terms, the fully implicit method is recommended for cases with strong viscous stress. This method requires an element matrix that is larger than those of the other methods. However, the time-step limit caused by the explicit or semiimplicit treatment of viscous stress terms can be avoided.
KW - Conservative discretization
KW - Finite element method
KW - Surface tension
KW - Temporal stability
KW - Viscous stress
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84949595632
U2 - 10.1007/s12206-015-1129-3
DO - 10.1007/s12206-015-1129-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84949595632
SN - 1738-494X
VL - 29
SP - 5273
EP - 5279
JO - Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
JF - Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
IS - 12
ER -