Abstract
Case-based reasoning (CBR) methods are applied to various target problems on the supposition that previous cases are sufficiently similar to current target problems, and the results of previous similar cases support the same result consistently. However, these assumptions are not applicable for some target cases. There are some target cases that have no sufficiently similar cases, or if they have, the results of these previous cases are inconsistent. That is, the appropriateness of CBR is different for each target case, even though they are problems in the same domain. Thus, applying CBR to whole datasets in a domain is not reasonable. This paper presents a new hybrid datamining technique called two-step filtering CBR and rule induction (TSFCR), which dynamically selects either CBR or RI for each target case, taking into consideration similarities and consistencies of previous cases. We apply this method to three medical diagnosis datasets and one credit analysis dataset in order to demonstrate that TSFCR outperforms the genuine CBR and RI.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 861-871 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Expert Systems with Applications |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2009 |
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence
- Case-based reasoning
- Credit analysis
- Datamining
- Hybrid method
- Medical diagnosis
- Rule induction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Two-step filtering datamining method integrating case-based reasoning and rule induction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver